The Scapular Devotion PDF Print E-mail
Written by Christian P. Ceroke, O.Carm.   
Saturday, 01 August 2009 00:00

 

The Blessed Virgin appeared to him with a multitude of angels holding in her blessed hands the Scapular of the Order. She said "This will be for you and for all Carmelites the privilege, that he dies in this will not suffer eternal fire," that is, he who dies in this will be saved. 1

There is no doubt that the origin of the Scapular devotion among the laity is traceable to this fourteenth century narrative. 2 Its composition has been dated about the mid-fourteenth century. 3 Of greater significance, however, than the date of the narrative, is its location in the Carmelite Sanctoral, where it forms the complete hagiographical notice on St. Simon Stock. If this story of the Marian apparition and promise were not found in the earliest hagiographical notice on St. Simon Stock, but only in documents of later origin, this fact would cast grave suspicion on the authentic origin of the tradition. The appearance in the fourteenth century narrative of the poem, the Flos Carmeli, reveals the existence of a cult of the apparition at this time within the Order. 4 A Marian devotion induced by the Scapular promise existed within the Car­melite Order before it arose among the laity. 5 The story of the apparition of Mary and the promise of the Scapular was a fully formed tradition within the Order by the mid-fourteenth century, one hundred years after the death of St. Simon Stock. The tradition was not originally motivated by the spread of the Scapular devotion among the laity. Nor was the tradition utilized by the medieval Carmelites to claim a unique Marian privilege. 6 The absence of these motives behind the tradition tells in favor of its authenticity.

In the past, scholars have urged three difficulties against the historicity of the Scapular promise: (1) absence of documentary evidence for the tradition from the thirteenth century7; (2) silence of Carmelite authors of the fourteenth century concerning the promise8; (3) confusion in the tradition between the Carmelite habit and the Carmelite Scapular as the garment supposedly desig­nated by Mary. 9 These objections no longer constitute serious diffi­culties against the authenticity of the Scapular tradition. Documen­tary evidence cannot be expected from the thirteenth century since the Carmelite Order did not begin to produce an extensive literature until the middle of the fourteenth century. 10 The appearance of the written tradition of the Scapular promise coincides with the blossom­ing of literary activity within the Order.11 In the face of modern research into the history of Carmelite literary activity in the four­teenth century, the argument from silence against the tradition of the scapular promise loses point. The account of the Marian appari­tion to St. Simon Stock is a constant written tradition as far back as literary activity reveals itself to be an important factor in the life of the Order. Finally, the conclusion of some historians that the apparition was originally associated by the Carmelites with their habit in general rather than with the Scapular in particular is certainly mistaken. There is an unbroken line of evidence, beginning with the Chapter of Montpellier in 1287 that the terms habit and Scapular were used interchangeably by the medieval Carmelites12 When the word habit is employed in Carmelite authors in connec­tion with the Marian promise to St. Simon Stock, the term means simply "Scapular."

The sole reason for rejecting the historical authenticity of the Scapular promise is the absence of thirteenth century documentation revealing Carmelite knowledge and acceptance of the story of the apparition. The absence of such evidence leaves open the possibility that the Scapular tradition developed as a legend in the thirteenth or early fourteenth century. While the possibility of a legendary origin for the tradition of the Scapular promise must be admitted, its legendary origin cannot be affirmed. 13 Beginning with the docu­mentary evidence in the fourteenth century, the essential details of the tradition remain invariable: (1) the apparition of Mary, (2) to St. Simon Stock, (3) with the Scapular, (4) stating the words of eternal life for all who die clothed in this garment.

 

The Sabbatine Privilege: Origin and Historical Critique

The Sabbatine Bull occupied a place of key importance in the spread of the Scapular devotion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Throughout this period the popes repeatedly promulgated the Sabbatine Privilege in allusion to the Bull of 1322 attributed to Pope John XXII: Clement VII (1530); Paul III (1534; 1549); Pius IV (1561); Pius V (1566); Gregory XIII (1577); Urban VIII (1628); Clement X (1673; 1674; 1675); Innocent XI (1678; 1679; 1682; i684). 14 Since according to the Sabbatine Privilege the souls of the faithful departed would benefit in purgatory from the intercession of the Blessed Virgin, the Church found it useful to stress the privilege in order to teach the legitimacy of the doctrine of indulgences and of Marian devotion. 15

The tradition of the Sabbatine Bull seems to have been first spread in the fifteenth century. The Bull was known to the Carmelites Calciuri in 1461 and Leersius in 1483. It was referred to by the Carmelite General Chapter of 1517. Historically, however, the tra­dition of the Sabbatine Bull is clearly vulnerable. No evidence of the Bull appears in the registers of John XXII. Although it is recognized that the absence of a papal document from the medieval registers is not a conclusive argument against its authenticity, no positive historical evidence from other sources supports the papal origin of the Bull. Its literary character is entirely too odd to recommend it as the work of John XXII. For these reasons, historians have rejected the authenticity of the Sabbatine Bull. 16 The apparent spuriousness of the Bull naturally casts serious doubt on its tradition that the Sabbatine Privilege originated in a Marian apparition to Pope John XXII. Three theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the tradition of the apparition and the Bull. According to one view the tradition would have originated in an oral declaration by John XXII. 17 This theory accounts for the spurious character of the Bull and for its peculiar style. The explanation is too conjectural to win credence. A second theory would derive the Sabbatine Bull from an original authentic document from John XXII which became corrupt in the course of time. 18 But no evidence has been produced from existing copies of the Bull to show a gradual corruption of its text. A third theory considers the Bull to be an interpretation, based on theological grounds, of the Marian promise to St. Simon Stock. 19 Since Mary's Mediation of Grace, of which her promise of eternal salvation is a reflection, embraces the final goal of the Christian life, which is union with God, it is logical to conclude that her maternal assistance makes itself felt in purgatory. 20 This third theory, that the Sabbatine Privilege is a more developed understanding of the significance of the Marian promise to St. Simon Stock, is the most plausible explanation of the origin of the Sabbatine Bull. The copies of the Bull indicate a close relationship between the promise to St. Simon Stock and the Sabbatine Privilege. The Bull states, "One who perseveres in holy obedience, poverty and chastity - or who will enter the Holy Order - will be saved." Then follows the declaration of the Sabbatine Privilege concerning release from purgatory for "others" who wear the holy "habit" of the Order. It would seem, then, that the Sabbatine Privilege arose historically in a fuller under­standing of the Marian promise to St. Simon Stock.

 



Footnotes

1. We have omitted the concluding paragraph of the hagiographical noticewhich simply states the death of St. Simon Stock at the Bordeaux Carmel. For the complete text, cf. Xiberta, De Visione, p. 283 [back]
2. In an appendix, Xiberta, De Visione, pp. 281-313, has published the papal manuscript texts of the Sanctoral. There are noticeable in them gradual additions and changes, the most evident being a notice on the wearing of the Scapular by the laity in the later manuscript copies of the fifteenth century. [back]
3. Benedict Zimmerman, O.C.D., The Carmelite Scapular, in The Month, Vol. 150, 1927, pp. 323-32,7, dated the earliest written account soon after 1361. Xiberta, De Visione, p. 205, dates it about the middle of the fourteenth century,perhaps in the early decades of the fourteenth century. [back]
4. Evidence has been discovered that the apparition to St. Simon Stock was
alluded to in the principal Marian feast of the English Province of Carmelites, the Solemn commemoration of Holy Mary. Margaret Rickert, reconstructing a Car­melite Missal of 1390, found fragments of the Mass for the feast on which were the words of the Flos Carmeli. CfT Vinculum Ordinis Carmelitarum, Vol. 3 (1952-I953) pp. 205-206. [back]
5. The earliest account of the apparition to St. Simon Stock contains no allu­sion to the Scapular devotion among the laity. The fact that the devotion did not arise until sometime after the acceptance of the apparition within the Carmelite Order is one of the more important discoveries of recent research into the traditionof the Scapular. Scholars in the past have sought historical evidence in the thir­teenth and early fourteenth centuries in the belief that the devotion among the laity would have been in vogue. Thus Thurston was inclined to reject the historicity of the apparition because of the absence of evidence in the thirteenth and four­teenth centuries revealing the existence of the Scapular devotion. Cf. Scapulars, in The Month, Vol. 150, 1927, p. 45. The belief that the devotion was practiced by the laity in the thirteenth century came from the Swanyngton fragments, published by John Cheron, O.Carm., in 1642. The fragments are now recognized as unauthentic. [back]
6. A clear illustration is the failure of the medieval Carmelites to use the Scapular promise in connection with their title, "Order of the Brothers of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel." John Horneby, who defended the title at the University of Cambridge in 1374, made no appeal to the apparition to St. Simon Stock, although by his time it was long in writing in the Carmelite Sanc­toral. Cf. Xiberta, De Visione, p.150. [back]
7. This point was pressed in the works of John Launoy. Cf. note 7. [back]
8. This objection was urged by Benedict Zimmerman, O.C.D., Monumenta Historica Carmelitana (Lirinae, 1907), pp. 343-344. [back]
9. Ibid., p. 343. [back]
10. P. Rudolf Hendriks, O.Carm., Le succession hereditaire, in Elie le prophete, Vol. 2 (Bruges, 1956), pp. 34-75. [back]
11. The fourteenth century account of the Scapular vision appears to be a literary production. It is a stylized, partly poetic, narrative. The story is not told as St. Simon Stock might have told it. It is related with a greater insight, born only with the passage of time, into the Order's mendicant difficulties in the thirteenth cen­tury. The Flos Carmeli was more probably not composed by St. Simon Stock, but was induced by the tradition of the Marian apparition. The narrative would have passed through an oral stage, and perhaps an initial written stage, before being incorporated into the Sanctoral in its fourteenth century form. Some indication of the initial written form may exist in a fifteenth century Brussels manuscript, which describes the apparition in these simple lines: "St Simon . . . always besought the Virgin in his prayers that she would endow her Order with a special privilege. The glorious Virgin appeared to him, holding the Scapular and saying, This will be for you and yours a privilege: he who dies in this will be saved.'" For the Latin text, cf. Xiberta, De Visione, p. 311. [back]
12. The Constitutions of 1294, 1324, and 1357 call the Scapular the habit. For the Acts of the Chapter of Montpellier, which made an explicit identification between "habit" and "scapular," cf. Antoine Marie de la Presentation, O.C.D.,Constitutions des Freres de Notre Dame du Mont-Carmel faites I'annee 1357(Marche, 1915), pp. 158-160. Xiberta, De Visions, p. 236, who interprets "habit" to mean "tunic" in the Acts of the Chapter of Montpellier, should be corrected.For the Constitutions of 1294 cf. Ludovicus Saggi, O.Carm., Constitutiones Cafituli Burdigalensis anni 1294, in Analecta Ord. Carm., Vol.18,1953, 152-153.For the Constitutions of 1324 cf. Zimmerman, Monumenta, pp. 49-52 [back]
13. The explanation of Lancelot C. Sheppard, The English Carmelites (London, I943), pp. 13ff., suggesting a legendary origin for the Scapular tradition, is an oversimplification. The author's statement that the early lessons of the breviary for the feast of St. Simon Stock are silent on the Scapular vision is unfounded. Cf. Xiberta, De Visione, pp. 127-130. [back]
14. Henry M. Esteve, O.Carm., De valore spiritual devotionis S. Scapularis (Romae, 1953), p. 61. [back]
15. lUd., pp. 59 ff. [back]
16. Papenbroeck, S.J., wrote a firm case against the authenticity of the Bull in his Responsio . . . ad Exhibitionem Errorum (Antwerpiae, 1696), p. 124 ff. The ques­tion was reviewed by Benedict Zimmerman, O.C.D., in The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Series 4, Vol. 15, 1904, pp. 331-351. [back]
17. Elias Magennis, O.Carm., The Sabbatine Privilege of the Scapular (New York, 1923), p. 47. [back]
18. Zimmerman, The Origin of the Scapular, in the Irish Ecclesiastical Record,Series 4, Vol. 15, 1904, p. 347. [back]
19. Esteve, op. cit., p. 309. [back]
20. Cf. C. X. J. M. Friethoff, O.P., A Complete Mariology (London, 1958), pp. 277-278. The author derives Mary's power to intercede for the souls in purgatory from her Queenship. [back]
 

Shopping Cart

VirtueMart
Your Cart is currently empty.

Store


Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consec
Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consec
$24.95



It Is Time to Meet St. Philomena
It Is Time to Meet St. Philomena
$5.95



Editors | Contributors

Cardinal Patron:
Luis Cardinal Aponte Martínez

Editor: Mark Miravalle, S.T.D.

Assistant Editors:
Kevin Clarke
Martin LaMartina
Emily Stimpson

Youth Editor:
Christopher Padgett

Contributing Authors:
Jonathan Baker
Msgr. Arthur B. Calkins
Fr. Maximilian Mary Dean, F.I.
Ambassador Howard Dee
Jason Evert
Fr. Robert Fox
Scott Hahn, Ph.D. 
Fr. Stefano Manelli, F.I.
Msgr. Charles Mangan
Fr. James McCurry, O.F.M.Conv. 
Michael O'Brien
Order of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Webmaster:
Christopher Wendt