Mary Co-Redemptrix as a Help in the Pursuit of Interreligious Dialogue

Updated: May 30, 2020



In 2004, I attended in Rome the Plenary of the Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue (May 2004) and also the Study Days on Vatican II’s Decree Ad Gentes (October 2004). At both these events it was emphasized that the Church’s commitment to Evangelization and to Dialogue go hand in hand. This eventually led me to dedicate this short reflection on “Mary Co-redemptrix as a help in Dialogue.”


In inter-religious dialogue it is of the utmost importance that both sides come to know each other’s faith position as accurately as possible. Now it is my contention that a Catholic’s presentation and explanation of Mary’s title and role as Co-Redemptrix would greatly help his/her dialogue-partner to understand correctly some basics of the Church’s teaching.


The title “Co-Redemptrix” would naturally provide the occasion to present our doctrine concerning the Redeemer. This would be preceded by the explanation of the mystery of Redemption. This would presuppose a catechesis on God, even the triune Gocd, and on Creation, including the creation of free human beings, who abused their freedom, with nefarious consequences for the entire human race, including its state of original sin and fall from grace.


These basic facts would lead one on to the history of salvation, of divinely initiated preservation from sin, of infinitely meritorious expiation for sin, of forgiveness of sin, of redemption, of reconciliation and restoration of communion with God. All this would show the primacy of God’s divine initiative and the absolutely uncontestable uniqueness of the Redeemer.


That being the true position, the question will surely be raised as to how then we can speak of Mary as “Co-Redemptrix.” The gender differentiation is not the issue. But the “Co” is. In fact, the Catholic faith uncompromisingly affirms one, divine, unique, universal Redeemer/Savior.


And yet this truth concerning Redemption is to be complemented with the indispensable need for the co-operation of the human beneficiary. Humans can sin by themselves, but they cannot save themselves by themselves. Even God will not save them without their free consent. Popular preachers explain this with reference to the “monkey way” versus the “cat way.”


In other words co-operation is required, from each one according to the freely designed and chosen plan of God. And it is our understanding and traditional Catholic teaching, revealed by God as defined by His Holiness Pope Pius IX on 8 December 1854, that: “The Most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by the singular grace and privilege of almighty God and in view of the merits of Christ Jesus the Savior of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin.”


This having been the case, we can help our partners-in-dialogue understand many other things about Mary: her perpetual virginity, her co-operation with, and submission to, the plan of God that she become the mother of Jesus, her closeness to Jesus, her nearness to him at the crucifixion, her intercessory advocacy and influence with Jesus, her assumption into heaven, her being Mother of the Church, Queen of Heaven and Mediatrix of all graces.


The title “Co” clarifies it all. She is in no way the Redemptrix of humanity and yet by the will of God and by her humble co-operation, she truly is, and deserves to be called/designated/honored as “Co-Redemptrix.” I have no doubt that non-Catholic Christians, participating in ecumenical dialogue, find this presentation acceptable, or at least have no valid/convincing argument against it. This is what happened to a Lutheran tribal girl of Ranchi in 1890 when she discovered that Catholics actually do not worship Mary, though they honor her because of her being the mother of Jesus. She (Ruth Kispotta) joined the Catholic Church and founded our first indigenous Congregation: the Daughters of St. Anne, Ranchi.


Adherents and followers of non-Christian faiths readily understand our position in the matter. This would also explain how it is that so many non-Christians flock to shrines of Our Lady all over the world, including the vast continent of Asia. They feel drawn to Mary because of her proximity to Jesus.


Some fifty years ago, a group of Hindu coalminers at Dhori near Jarangdih in the Department of Bokaro, Jharkhand, India, dug up a wooden statue of a Lady with a child in her arms. They at once proclaimed her a goddess. So the statue was taken in procession to the office of the manager where it was temporarily installed and worshiped. But soon people began to wonder. They could not recall having seen a statue of a goddess with a child in her arms. When the local Catholic priest was called to look at it, he at once recognized it as a statue of Our Lady with the Child Jesus. It was gladly handed over to him. To day there is a shrine in honor of “Dhori Ma” also known as “Lady of the mines.” She is visited by tens of thousands: Christians, Hindus, Muslims. All appreciate the Mother who takes care of the child and is entirely at its service. Pilgrims are correctly evangelized and, while they venerate Mary, no one considers her a goddess. The truth about Jesus can thus be made clear. Mary very effectively leads devotees to Jesus, the one true u